Plano DWI Lawyer Blog

When a person is arrested for DWI in Texas, they will soon face a criminal charge. Most people understand this. Many of the people that consult with me about their DWI  do not know that they will soon be dealing with a civil case that is addressed exclusivley to the issue of whether their license to drive will be suspended.  This civil case is known as Administrative License Revocation or ALR .

Many people who are aware of the process and the deadlines, nevertheless don't understand the value in exercsing their right to a hearing.  I am frequently asked if the hearings can be won.  The answer is an emphatic YES!  ALR hearing can be won, and often are won by experienced and dilligent DWI attorneys. 

Some of the reasons why it is always a good idea to request an ALR hearing are as follows.

1.  It is one method to force disclosure of the "discovery."  The discovery is a term that refers to the documentary evidence that the Department of Public Safety's attorneys plan to use to seek suspension fo your license.  By using the ALR discovery process, you can force the State to reveal details about the evidence against you.

2.  You can subpoeana the arresting officer to the ALR hearing.  By issuing a subpoena to the arresting officer you can compel his or her testimony under oath.  This may be the only opportunity that you will have to question the officer under oath about the facts of your case prior to trial.

3.   The ALR hearing is an opportunity to explore defenses and issues in your criminal DWI case.  At the ALR hearing, you will have an opportunity to, among other things, contest the legality of the stop of your car, contest the lawfulness of the process by which your breath or blood was collected.

4.  ALR hearings are often won.  With an experienced DWI attorney, flaws in the ALR case can be exposed and turned to your advantage.  If you win the ALR hearing, the Department of Public Safety will not be authorized to suspend your license.

5.  When you request an ALR hearing, your license to drive will be preserved at least until the hearing. 

What should your attorney look for in handling an ALR case?

Just by way of example,

Did the police stop your car lawfully?

Does the admissible evidence concerning the police observations establish probable cause to arrest?

In a Chapter 524 case, is there admissible proof that you operated the car?

In a blood test case, was blood collected in a sanitary place by a person authorized to draw blood.

Did the police comply with the fifteen minute observation period?

Did the police impart any erroneous advice related to the consequences of refusing or taking a breath test? 

Was the discovery promptly turned over by the Department's Attoreys?

This is a just a partial list of the sort of issues that can be effectively raised in properly handling an ALR case.  If you have been arrested for DWI, please do yourself a favor and consult and experienced DWI attorney within FIFTEEN DAYS of your arrest.  The failure to request an ALR hearing within 15 days will result in a suspension of your license.

According to a press release issued by the Plano Police Department, the Plano Police plan to conduct a so called no refusal weekend over the Memorial Day weekend. The press release is here.

During a no refusal operation, if you are arrested on suspicion of DWI and refuse to submit to a breath or blood test, the police will prepare an affidavit in support of a search warrant application.  The affidavit must recite facts that demonstrate that the police have probable cause to believe that you were DWI and that evidence of alcohol or drugs will be found in your blood.   The police will then present the affidavit to a judge who will review if for probable cause.  In practice, the police rarely appear in person before a judge and swear to the affidavit.  Rather, the typical practice is for them to fax it or recite it over the phone.

Recently, the Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas sidestepped the question of whether the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure requires that the police swear to the facts contained in the affidavit in the personal presence of the magistrate.

In the case of Swenson v. State of Texas the Court stated that

In a guest column in a local Collin County newspaper, the Frisco Texas police department has announced that it will be seeking blood from Driving While Intoxicated suspects over the upcoming Holidays. There is nothing per se unusual about this, but for the fact that they plan to conduct the blood draw at the Frisco Police station.  The blood would be drawn from the suspect not at a hospita,l where there are facilites and equipment available to deal with an emergency should one arise, but in the confines of the Frisco Police Department.

The Texas Transportation Code section 724.017 requires that the the blood of a DWI suspect be drawn in a "sanitary place."  Is the Frisco Police Department a sanitary place within the meaning of the law?  The broader question, in my mind anway, is why?  Is the need to obtain a blood sample so urgent  that the police can't wait a few minutes to transport the arrested person to a hospital?  Not at all.  In fact, traditionally, blood draws have nearly alwsy been taken at a hospital.  In my view, the convenience of having the blood drawn a the police station is vastly outweighed by the risks associated with sticking a needle into a person about whom the police know next to nothing.  For example, the police will not know anything about the person's medical condition and history, allergies, etc.

,